Nation and Migration

In order to build a revolution to overcome our society’s Capitalism , we need to build a working class  . But we can only build this revolutionary party by engaging in all relevant issues affecting the working class, which I lay out in these sections of my blog 

I feel that Socialism is better than Nationalism without adjectives as Socialism is the heart of a post National world and creates better solidarity than Nationalism without adjectives and all forms of Right wing Nationalisms. However, every socialist movement had essential components of nationalism. 

However this author defended Nationalism, in the early USSR they implemented Korenizatsiya (inspired by Vladimir Lenin) and Soviet Patriotism which are similar to Nationalism, Mikhail Bukinin was a Nationalist briefly and Nationalism was originally a Left wing concept during the French Revolution, so that’s why I am or support some Center Left Nationalisms and Left wing Nationalisms

One critique I have of Nationalisms is the whole National Memory make up of Nationalism. Nations change and many forms of Nationalism that seek to shove our history down our throat (i.e Garden of Heroes nonsense, Memorial Day or Patriots Day etc), makes me anathemic to a lot to most forms of Nationalism. Fascists and deep Right wingers ruined Nationalism

However, I believe that the nation is defined as the totality of persons bound together through a common destiny into a community of character. To me, national identity is not necessarily obstructive toward class consciousness, existing as a useful praxis for the self determination of the worker. 

The issues with National identity (within a capitalist society) was not national identify itself but really the tendency of the lower classes to cling to traditions which tether them to the institutions of the old bureaucratic and capitalistic systems in addition to nationality being conceived of exclusive racial/ethnic and territorial means .

I feel that the notions of territorial principle can be substituted in situations where minority populations risked being subjugated by majorities. 

We can use Karl Renner's notion of the "personal principle" as a way of gathering the geographically divided people of the same nation. The personal principle can be used to organize nations not in territorial bodies but in a simple association of persons. 

This would radically disjoin a nation from its territory thus creating a non territorial associated nation. It is important to doing way with sub national territorial identities as undemocratic and allowing for the treatment of non majority populations within each nation that Karl Renner wrote about here. 

Basically, the nation should be conceived as an evolutionary process via open, plural and political construction

The societies who created the modern world should not apologize for creating the modern world

Our great culture we have today originated in Greece, Persia, Egypt and with the Cherokee peoples (to name a few). Free Democracy was born out of that and spread to almost the whole world. 

I do not want the US to lose its national identity in a way where the US culture is unrecognizable to what it traditionally is. Otherwise why have a country at all? We should share our common historical solidarity. Our nations are a reflection of our unique spirit and ideas. 

I take some of the black block Autonomous decentralized Antifa groups' ideas (ie like Anti Globalism, Anti imperialism, Anti Capitalism) and fuse them with my own since I support Autonomism . I also support some of said groups

I view specific blocks of ANTIFA in the same exact way that British viewers viewed Alf Garnett on Till Death Us Do Part. 

Like those British viewers overlooking Alf's bigoted views due to his earthly charm to see Alf as a rough diamond, I similarly overlook the edgy, provocative and partial Liberalism 2.0 views of those specific blocks of ANTIFA due to their earthly charm to see those specific blocks of ANTIFA as rough diamonds

I echo this critique of autonomous antifascism

Any autonomous ANTIFA blocks that have antifascists that work with Al Qaeda or ISIS, as alleged here if true, should be confronted by their ANTIFA block or if not their block ,ally ANTIFA blocks and and disavowed entirely for said alleged extremism and if they refuse to stop working with those terrorist groups , they should be marked as a counter revolutionary by various other ANTIFA blocks at future ANTIFA protests for obvious reasons

ANTIFA has blocks that have a huge presence on every college campus, major western city, and is protesting zealously on a monthly basis . 

They are being a little to rough of a diamond at times including here , here and allegedly above ,to the point where the FBI and DHS were actively investigating them (see here for example). If ANTIFA uses its decentralized, autonomous nature as an excuse to allow a few bad apples , that will spoil the whole bunch and then ANTIFA will be seen as counterproductive and expendable to Liberal 2.0ers. 

If this was the other way around, Democrats would have made ANTIFA go the way of the Tea Party 

Sometimes we have to accept that social groups will be repressed as a key part of class struggle against exploitative classes . But the light at the end of that tunnel is bright

I always fight against oppression

Down with all forms of antisemitism, xenophobia, sexism and prejudice

I support Patriotism and Social Patriotism 

I support Left Wing Nationalism

I don’t care for Left Wing populism and I find it divisive 

I am a Civic Nationalist

I support Bill Maher type of Western values traditionalism

In part due to the inner Ego Anarchist in me, I support Pro Western Leftism and fraternalism

I support what some people would call ‘Bourgeois’ Civic Nationalism based on the Scottish model. 

I would only support this type of Civic Nationalism in the extremely rare hypothetical cases 

I support former President Theodore Roosevelt’s New Nationalism

This article makes some good points on cultures

I support the importance of the battle for cultural hegemony in times of crisis where an electoral project can articulate and draw together various democratic demands and create a political subject that can carry this program through. This can be done via populism

I want Anarchists to cultivate harmony between certain anarchist ideologies and to unite against the state

Anarchists have rightfully overthrown elite ruling classes, oppressive empires and states and should unite under than precept. Anarchy should be restored to the way it was in the late 19th century and early 20th century for me to embrace other forms of it besides the few I embrace now

I hope that all Right Wing Nationalists and Conservative Nationalists stop being small minded and ignorant and stop being Right Wing Nationalists and Conservative Nationalists . 

I then hope they become either Patriotic Socialists who blur the line of being European Socialists or become Post Nationalists. This would be a gateway to help them move more left

I admit that Liberal Nationalism and Democratic Patriotism (like current Democrats and people who like Joe Biden fight for the rights of all people) at least seemingly improves the rights of all marginalized groups in the US.  Constitutional Conservatives or Stephen Miller type troll Nationalists are a threat to this and there is a unique way to use Liberal Nationalism and Democratic Patriotism to fight that right of center threat

Eventually in the future once Liberal Nationalism and Democratic Patriotism reaches its intended goal and there is no need from from Liberal 2.0ers to have Liberal Nationalism and Democratic Patriotism anymore, it will make our country as a whole less divisive, more united and thus more motivated to prevent regressing on that issue. 

Any actual injustices against Constitutional Conservatives or Stephen Miller type troll Nationalists in such a new world (which would be extremely rarer than it is now) will no longer be tolerated or accepted by anyone, not even by their political rivals, thus not giving them even a hint of the appearance of an excuse for garbage

So basically Liberal Nationalism and Democratic Patriotism,  can have a trickle down effect to help Constitutional Conservatives or Stephen Miller type troll Nationalists not be Constitutional Conservatives or Stephen Miller type troll Nationalists like how Capitalists claim that Capitalism can have a trickle down effect to help poor people.

This echos my thoughts on White Nationalism: https://web.archive.org/web/20220524210933/https://www.facinghistory.org/educator-resources/current-events/explainer/white-nationalism

White Nationalism is deplorable, ignorant madness. White Nationalists should stop being White Nationalists. I am very upset that more and more people are being brainwashed to be White Nationalists and because White Nationalism is moving into the mainstream. 

We need to unbrainwash White Nationalists so they stop being that way and we need to stop White Nationalism from being mainstreamed. I hate seeing underground things get mainstreamed, brainwashing one mindless zombie at a time, especially evil things like White Nationalism. 

They should not try to force their White Nationalist will on our country since White Nationalism is wrong , small minded, bourgeois and is dystopia for our country and any country. 

White ethnostates would be boring vanilla places because there would be no diversity and just whites. 

I love diversity , I like people because they are different, I do not like everyone being the same or doing the same things, so seeing White ethnostates would drive me insane and would trigger me since they'd all look the same 

Another reason (reason 24,986,922,167,986) that White Nationalism sucks is because I feel that White Nationalists are snowflakes and pussies. 

White Nationalists are snowflakes and pussies because they are not mentally strong enough to suck it up and live around BIPOC+ and try to get along with them. 

This is because White Nationalists whine about needing their pathetic white safe spaces to avoid being triggered or offended which annoys the heck out of me hearing those snowflakes acting like babies. 

That is the exact type of behavior we see from some Liberal 2.0 snowflakes so White Nationalists are hypocrites

We need to aggressively reprogram and use otherWhite Nationalists to realize that the GRT is a myth

Interracial marriage and migration are not a legitimate form of white replacement.  They are good, natural and healthy acts that are the lifeblood of any free and Democratic and inclusive country

I feel Tucker Carlson isn't an intelligent person if he gets his talking points on migration from the deep Right Wing/Alt right forums. He should do more research and rely on better sources before he speaks about migration and Democrats. 

More and more hispanic voters are voting Republican than Democrat so that disproves Tucker Carlson’s wild migration theories

Even if migrants voted more D than R, (https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/07/22/are-unauthorized-immigrants-overwhelmingly-democrats) , so what? 

It may be true but there is no hidden 'conspiracy' by Democrats to have Democrat voter migrants magically replace non Democrat voter migrants. The Democrats aren't smart enough to devise such a scheme.  We can't even pass Left wing economic policies with a Democrat house.  

In the Emerging Democratic Majority, a 2002 book by John Judis and Teixeira, predicted the coalition of college graduates and minority voters that brought former President Barack Obama to power. Democrats path’s to victory involves expanding the electorate with young and diverse voters something that the Republicans neglect

In 2013, the Center for American Progress said, "Supporting real immigration reform that contains a pathway to citizenship for our nation's 11 million undocumented immigrants is the only way to maintain electoral strength in the future."

The Republicans appealing to mostly white voters (like in 2016 in Donald’s Trump faux election victory)  ,being border-hawks and being hard on migration pushes many migrants (many of whom come from Liberal 2.0 or Democrat countries in Europe, Canada, South America etc) to vote Democrat.

Democrats may know somewhere inside what that pew article says in terms of more migrants probasily voting D than R but that isn’t why they are pro migrant. 

Though it might unconsciously or very deep down inside push Democrats to not move right at all on illegal immigration, securing the border, bipartisanship on migration etc.

If Republicans would ease up on migration , come left a bit and be more inclusive and big tent, maybe they can get the migrant vote over the Democrats. If Republicans want to stop migrants from voting Democrat then the Republicans should try to win the migrant vote instead of coming up with wild theories   

America has always been a haven for migrants of all identities. Our country was Native American before it was stolen by aristocratic imperialist bourgeois colonist Europeans so even if it we became majority BIPOC, it would be like the pre colonized US. 

When I want a cultural shakeup, I support a notorius m agonistic strand of radical democracy which seeks to expand democracy in equality and liberty and thus radically expand and extend all civil liberties 

I like people BECAUSE they are different (see lifestyle blog for more). I am a diversity enthusiast and fanboy. 

But this article keeps me from going too far in my diversity enthusiasm and solid liking of diversity

We need a national revolution against the existing liberal-parliamentarian order

I support the Manitoba Canada type of Multiculturalism 

I see Multiculturalism as more than just a silver lining because it allows migrants who are from countries that don’t celebrate American holidays to not be forced to celebrate them like with schools banning public Thanksgiving events and parties). I. also Multiculturalism allowing different cultural values as a positive

We cannot fight against the extreme right with its forms or methods. We must organize to deepens the, dialogue and practices to curb them

We cannot definitively ignore that one of the elements of their negative speeches is that which undermines the authority and legitimacy of women which it does by exercising political hostility toward them, which can hinder their access to the exercise of their political rights which can hurt both sexes. 

We need tools to stop these anti woman reactions from the right in a way that upholds the values of the feminist movement

It is good to have an inclusive society in which each person is part of the entire fabric of our society and has access to social, political, labor and gender rights in order to create an environment where cultural and social diversity is key to social development as opposed to using bourgeois aristocratic saviorism, political opportunism, having to rely on Liberal leftist reactionarism (like SJW and cancel culture) and cold bureaucracy to do so. 

The fight against injustice and prejudice must move toward a more inclusive, dynamic and committed form of participation with the plural and complex realities in our current era

So we must focus on implementing comprehensive policies which don’t focus on immigrants or BIPOC persons but instead focuses on the origin and consequences of the exact problem as a whole

Immigrants and BIPOC people, active subjects with rights, not victims and through direct democracy and having a foot in the street so to speak, the state must work to guarantee that. It is important that they get the recognition of their agency, capacity and their political subjectivity. 

It is important that diversity in political participation, decision making, public spaces and via representation, doesn’t occur exclusively in just debates and in the decision making spaces concerning only racial-ethnic oppression and the immigrant condition, but rather, they must be present in all debates on the political and social future of this country. So they can be the change they see

So public policies should be tilted toward constitutional guarantees of equalization of rights among all people and in the public square we must make sure our country fulfills this role and establishes mechanisms that allow the enforceability of rights.

We must use greater force to get our politicians to commit to Modern Egalitarian theory principals, and anti income/class inequality and anti injustice perspectives

We tend to defend culture as that which breaks the closure of the description of reality imposed from power/powers. 

For this rupture to happen, access to culture must be guaranteed for people in its greatest possible diversity, making it easier for all artistic discourses to find their audience. Let us avoid certain maxims: no, culture per se does not make us free. 

What gives us critical thinking tools, what allows emancipation processes, is the possibility of access to the different cultural manifestations and discourses. 

If we only stick to a deliberately reduced canon, culture will be serving to prop up a certain and privileged perspective, leaving dissenting views and voices silenced (or potentially silenced). 

The task we have as a political organization is to open the canon and at the same time favor the prescription of those compositions (in all areas) that for reasons of gender, class, ethnicity, language, sexual orientation or identity, can be left out being very valuable productions and works for the whole of our collective imagination.

In this task it is also necessary to emphasize that without citizenship there is no culture. This principle has been repeatedly ignored in the cultural policies that have been developed on the right and on the left since the transition to the present day. 

Large empty containers of content and interaction with society, and a process of unbridled privatization of the most popular and interesting initiatives are the mud that explains this sludge. 

We know that it is in neighborhood spaces, neighborhoods and towns, where grassroots cultural projects are proposed that find a greater citizen response and where the most interesting and innovative meetings and artistic manifestations take place. 

Basically we want and need these models for our great and consecrated structures. A new culture for the great museums of the State, that not only keep history in a showcase, but also allow citizens to build the museum every day, that permeates its time and the people of that time.

Migration

The US having laxer and less border security on its border with Canada than it does on its border with Mexico, is obviously racial profiling and thus due to bigotry, since there is no other reason for this vast discrepancy (Canada is mostly white while Mexico is mostly BIPOC).   “The relatively low level of security measures stands in contrast to that of the United States–Mexico border (one-third length of Canada–U.S. border), which is actively patrolled by U.S. Customs and Border Protection personnel to prevent illegal migration and drug trafficking.”  Wikipedia (like Canada doesn’t have drug traffickers themselves) 

“While the Republican leadership in Congress focuses on the Southern border with 10,000 Border Patrol agents stationed along the 2,000-mile border with Mexico, only 1/10th that amount is on the Canadian border, a border that is 2.5 times as long as the Mexican border.  Recent news stories state that people drive, walk, sail, ski, and sled across the Northern border all the time” Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren

Also see here, here

The US barely had border security on its border with Canada before 9/11 (see here) and also passports weren’t required to go between the US and Canada before 9/11. 

To not give off this obvious appearance of bigotry and double standards as mentioned above ,the US would and really should implement the same lax border security on its border with Mexico that it had on its border with Canada pre 9/11 and the US would and really should require no passport requirement for Mexicans to enter the US as it had no passport requirement for Canadians to enter the US pre 9/11. 

What I wrote in the above few paragraphs and my Libertarianism plays a big part in my migration views, as you’ll see throughout my blog

My views on migration vary based on whatever the current conditions exist at the time.

I advocate protection of all workers rights no matter country of origin

I view deporting illegal immigrants for virtually any reasons in a negative light because I am not a fan of any Americans, legal or illegal emigrating from the US at all. 

Americans (legal and illegal) emigrating from the US to other countries saddens me because I miss Americans (legal and illegal) when they emigrate to another country like I miss my family and friends when they die and because I feel their moving away from the US is too big of a shake up in their lives

Off the record, I do feel that illegal immigrants who trespass into the US illegally without a visa (like who cross the border illegally without anyone looking) or who go to the US on a vacation and overstay their passport , as long as they are in the US for a under a year or two, ESPECIALLY if they haven’t assimilated or even integrated  ,after they are caught, they should first be given a chance to register for asylum or as a refugee using laxer criteria than we have now for asylum seekers and refugees and if they can’t meet those conditions, then they should be deported under our current system, until we implement my ideas in this section and its links.  

If I went into Sweden, Germany, Canada or Australia or England illegally right now and was caught within a year or two I would be deported from those countries too

Moreover deportation is also a waste of taxpayer money

I am against smugglers (like coyotes) smuggling in illegal immigrants into the US. I believe the US should extremely increase security to prevent those smugglers from that and to shut down their smuggling businesses

The US must work in Central America to address the root causes of migration from Central America, to recognize that we don't need to sacrifice our humanity in the name of security. We also must work with Mexico to make sure that it takes its own border security seriously. 

Moreover, working with our neighbors to improve security across the region is an imporant component of any policy to promote prosperity and fairness in the hemisphere. A safe and secure region will lead to a safer, more secure United States.  

I also believe that the US also must engage with countries like Mexico and in Central America to address the causes that cause them to migrate to the US illegally

If I don’t sound as strongly pro migrant (even though I am Left wing on migration), its only because since I am generally against Capitalism I realize the negative effects Capitalism has on legal and illegal migrants. 

For example I realize that mass illegal migration and overwhelming/endless legal migration (the type of migration where can barely afford to take care of our own people let alone overwhelming/endless migrants) is beneficial to the capitalist class and thus that makes me feel that mass illegal migration and overwhelming/endless legal migration is effectively a net negative in my eyes. Many migrants come in and take jobs away from citizens which increases unemployment

When migration that happens within a capitalist countries (like the US) sadly it can be seen as a modern day version of bondage (like in the Old South) 

Back then, there was colonialist exploitation happening within a capitalist country via bondage due to similar conditions to today. 

Today via mass illegal migration and overwhelming/endless legal migration, legal migrants and illegal migrants sadly end up working below minimum wage or barely minimum wage in a subsistence type existence (like construction work of migrants in some parts of the US for example) within a capitalist country not too much better or different than the type of dehumanizing capitalist worker exploitation that slaves were put through in the Old South. 

A lesser but still relevant reason I don’t sound strongly pro migrant (even though I am Left wing on migration), is because I see the negative effect of migration in that migration is used to undercut wages and that migration can be detrimental to the entire working class. 

Ideally, migration should be designed around the economic interests of the American people and especially Americans at the bottom of the labor market . 

A study of the struggle waged by the American working class reveals that, in order to oppose their workers, the employers either bring in workers from abroad or else transfer manufacture to countries where there is a cheap labor force.

When we defeat Capitalism and usher in a more socialistic country that meshes with my economic views, I will become more pro migrant and very pro migrant

Personally and legality wise , I don’t want the US to implement my migration reform ideas below (including this moderate type of migration reform) until we clear the migration backlogs  

The backlog of 600,000-plus fugitive deportee cases. The backlog of four million immigration applications of all kinds. The backlog of an estimated 100,000 FBI background checks for legal immigrant applicants. The disappearance of 111,000 citizenship applications.   The above numbers are from 2007 but I am sure the numbers are similar to that today.

The Washington Post reported in 2007 that those loads of unprocessed paperwork was growing. Over a few hundred thousand immigrants who come here legally continue to wait for FBI background checks before they become naturalized. 

This backlog of the legal migrants' naturalization applications (and other benefits), from 2005-2007 for example doubled to 329,160.   There is also slow processing time for asylum seekers which causes delay

Thus we should fix the above mess first before we implement my migration ideas below (including this moderate type of migration reform).  

We also should clear the obstacles to a Path of Citizenship for legal migrants who followed the rules before we do the same to illegal immigrants as mentioned below.  Let's give legal migrants priority over illegal migrants and give them both priority by clearing the backlogs.  

Personally I feel the US should implement a migration system based on the holocracy model and Dignity proposal for illegal immigrants so illegal immigrants who can’t meet the conditions of one of those systems could be able to meet the conditions of the other migration system

This holocracy model is a new tier or holocracy of longterm permanent residency that would allow immigrants who are in the US illegally who don’t meet the Dignity proposal requirements to legally attain citizenship in 18 years or so

If they register for the new tier or holocracy , illegal immigrants who have lived illegally in the country for a substantial amount of time would be able to work and live in US, while they wait to become citizens, as long as they pay taxes and don’t receive any felony convictions. 

All illegal immigrants who don’t meet the holocracy model requirements might be eligible under the amnesty to get 10-year work visas so long as they pass a criminal background check, pay taxes, and continue taking an American job. The amnesty states that these illegal aliens will not be eligible for “means-tested benefits or entitlements” and must pay a fine 

After holding work visas for 10 years, illegal aliens would be eligible to go through a five-year program, which includes learning English and taking civics courses, to eventually secure a green card. Once a green card is secured, illegal aliens are able to apply to become naturalized American citizens 

This also includes mandatory E-Verify, funding for a “full border infrastructure system,” asylum reform, and increased interior immigration enforcement but a more progressive LPR visa program  .

Moreover personally, I feel that public migration policies should incrementally move towards a different horizon of migration governance in which all people’s rights are respected. For this, we would need an elaboration of citizenship and human mobility laws that are dignified and respectful of human rights.

But to expand rights within the current regulatory framework, until we reach that horizon personally I feel the US should moderately move toward bringing back their 1870s through early 1920s migration system. Eventually when we reach that horizon we will move on from this migration system 

Legality wise, I feel that the US should consider making all illegals who have lived in the US and contribute in some way to our society for at least a few years (give or take a year or two), and basically integrated “de facto legal by default” (but without publicly making such a virtue signaling proclamation, only through actions not words)

This way , there would be less bickering and divisiveness over this issue since that would be a stealth way to extremely decrease illegals in the US without deporting them or creating harsh anti immigration policies (but different than former President Ronald Reagan did it with his 1986 IRCA, in part because this wouldn’t be amnesty but a fundamental change to permanently blur or even remove the lines between legal and ‘illegal’ immigrant while retro fitting current illegals into this change by making them ‘de facto legal by default’). 

Can’t complain about ‘illegal’ immigrants if there is hardly a line between legal and illegal immigrants.

We should really try to prioritize the concept of citizenship by putting the fact of residence first while we also separate access to political rights from the degree of national identification. 

Giving primacy to citizenship over nationality would imply giving priority to our political society, and this would entail a less organic conception of that community, and more open. podemos

The US is the border of North America. But that cannot be translated into being the border control police. This must be translated into a fair and humanitarian vision of migration, which respects the right to migrate and the right to life. podemos

Then after decades of this, I would then want the US to go from being a Constitutional republic with states into a Communitarian Nomadic Empire (along with the rest of North America and maybe Central America) and thus have true open borders by default 

This way ,people would form natural communities throughout the Nomadic Empire North America based on their connections to said communities. Moreover, their social identifies and personalities would be molded by their community relationships with some individualism thrown into the mix. 

Migrants (there would be no such thing as illegal migrants in this system) to the Nomadic Empire North America would form and find their own Communitarian communes in this Nomadic Empire North America based on shared cultural values. 

Eventually after decades or more of this, maybe new countries and nations might possibly possibly form/reform 

In part because it looks like we can’t stop the spread of cultural corporatist imperialism (i.e Globalization) , my possible solution to our migration issues if our world continues to be globalized is for the borders of all countries being razed together creating an open world (or at worst a world where countries who didn’t raze their borders instead implemented either the Labour party UK ‘open borders’  or this subreddit’s version of open borders instead). 

But first I would want to use the.path below to get there 

This path to our open world would have stronger borders to avoid conflict with and capitalist influence from capitalist countries (A lot of our migrants come from Capitalist or Capitalist adjacent countries). We would inspire other countries to do the same

Strong borders mean less of that bourgeois capitalist conflict and influence (which we get now from mass migration, chain migration, illegal migration etc) as we lay the ground work for and begin to transition from a Capitalist country that sadly treats migrants like second class citizens to a open world

These stronger borders would not be for restricting migration, these stronger borders would be for restricting reverse Neoliberal/Capitalism imperialism and by extension the bourgeois and aristocratic baggage that comes with it (which by doing so will help the legal and illegal migrants who are already living in the US get richer and more equality since the closer we get to an open world the more income equality grows and barriers between classes shrink which can only happen by stronger borders to prevent capitalistic barriers to this transition) 

But during this stronger borders phase, there would be a the Conservative Party UK's Points Based Immigration System along with the US setting up a system of annual temporary citizen exchanges (trading millions of legal American citizens for citizens in other countries a year, especially in North America and Central America) . 

But preferences would be given for skilled immigration under this temporary citizen exchange. These temporary citizen exchanges would not delay or hamper our phasing out of capitalism as non stronger borders would

If after temporarily re living in the US after a few years, these temporary citizen exchange migrants in the US Live together assimilate or are bicultural, are not convicted of crimes, terrorism or treason, don’t create chain migration, are ideally patriotic , show minimal knowledge of US history, government and the English language, have a steady job, are in college or the military, they can become permanent citizens of the US if they pay a one time exchange to permanent citizen tax and renounce their citizenship of their previous country to make their permanent residency official

This would be done to create a open world that will be extremely more pro migrant than our current capitalist country with lax or open borders can ever be. A little less migration NOW for MUCH MORE migration in the future 

Think of this like putting a tourniquet on a huge wound to stop the bleeding, here strong borders would stop the bleeding done by the commidifaction and abuses of capitalism , allowing our country to move to become part of an open world at which time the bleeding (ie the cronies of capitalism) will stop and we will be in open world utopia with open borders and as pro of a migrant country as we can have.

This will be all thanks to us transitioning from Capitalism to an open world which cannot be done with the pettiness of capitalism pouring into our country via mass migration, illegal migration and chain migration 

So everything I write above is for the US until we usher in an open world and also because I am being contrarian (being too pro migrant is a mainstream ‘liberal’ view to have, being like I am on migration is contrarian). 

Eventually as Capitalism is phased out and socialism is reigned in, we would relax some of the criteria for settlement,  the criteria for residence and work permits and reestablish legal and safe pathways  podemos

Then I would want the borders of all countries on Earth to be razed together creating an open world (or at worst all countries on Earth who don’t raze their border, implement either the Labour party UK ‘open borders’  or this subreddit’s version of open borders instead). 

Since I am against North Korea and the Soviet bloc forbidding emigration, I have no choice but to be against countries forbidding immigration, even illegal immigration , so I don’t look like a hypocrite

Freedom of movement is a right as history has shown and this would fundamentally fix the bigger issue surrounding migration once and for all (no border world/open world is better than open borders in a few or some countries). After the travel restrictions in the last few years, it is easy to embrace the freedom of movement line of thinking

One way to make the open planet thing work would be to have our planet literally become one country (which would also create an open planet by default) and all 7.5 billion people on Earth could even be incentivized to move to a far away random place on Earth (basically every town and city on Earth would be reshuffled to consist entirely of transplants from dozens to hundreds of random countries on Earth with possibly a very few people native to the area living in said towns/cities) 

All cities and towns on Earth would be rebooted and have the very similar demographics as each other city and town on Earth as is the case in existing countries. Think of this as a real life city town randomizer 

This could mean the Earth would be literally gentrified (ending cultural shock forever) as the whole planet would be culturally and demographically similar (as most states and provinces in existing countries are culturally and demographically similar to other states and provinces in those existing countries.

This is the most unique way to unite Earth and all people on Earth, to be united as the people of Earth in the movie Independence Day were united. 

Like in some Speculative Fiction set in The Future, it might be the natural order of things that all governments will merge together to create a central authority to govern the entire planet.

Some examples of this concept include All the Troubles of the World, Apocalypse film series, Barbarella, Bicentennial Man, The Fifth Element, The Starship Troopers, Space Truckers, The Omega Code, Z.P.G, Babylon 5, Doctor Who: In "Last of the Time Lords", Firefly, the Alliance, Intergalactic, The Orville, The Outer Limits (1995), seaQuest DSV, Star Trek. See this for more

In real life, the United Nations was a possible choice for fulfilling this one planet country to function before the organization was created in the role that it serves today. In fiction, alien planets most of the time have only one government.

OR

If that is impractical we should as an alternative, have the United States ,Mexico and Central America form a supranational nation  (similar to the European Union or European States of Europe) which would by default make the vast majority of illegals who are currently living in the US 'legal' and treat migration between the US and those countries as migration between EU countries is treated. 

I'd also want every few years for there to be a mandatory Brexit type vote for the US, Mexico and those Central American countries in said supernational union to decide if they want to stay or pull out of this suprnational union, similar to Britain's Brexit vote years back. 

This would mean no border checks between North America Union countries or states . However, the migration policies to this North America Union countries or states from outside of North America would mesh with Left wing European borderhawks migration views/platform fused with the Bush’s Center’s migration views/platform

I would like to see the currency of the US become more universalized.

My views on whether I believe that illegal immigrants should vote are reflected by my views in this section of my blog and in similar sections of my blog

I am Left Wing on migration, and while the cosmopolitan argument here doesn’t make me support closed borders, it does make me open minded to coming right a bit on migration where I would support this moderate type of migration reform or even where I could if pushed ever so slightly look the other way (but not endorsing) if the US ever requires a small fee for illegal immigrants who are in the US less than 7 years to vote (until they become legal then its free).  

To open border people who think I am too harsh on migration, if someone broke into your house and was living in your attic for a few years and they got settled in and you caught them living there, what would you do?  

Illegal Immigrants should NOT have more rights than legal citizens. They  should have the same rights

Illegal Immigrants should NOT have easier access healthcare than legal citizens do , they should have the same access

Illegal immigrants should NOT have easier accesss to welfare and UBI than legal citizens do, they should have the same access

Illegal immigrants and refugees don't commit more or less crime/violent crime than legal citizens. 

Maybe we can get all Trump extremists (like the ones mentioned by John Brennan and GWB in 2021) to self deport and only be allowed to move back to the US when they become deradicalized 

This quote could help borderhawks and ‘xenophobes’ be inclusive to migrants 

by Mark Twain “ Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts. Broad, wholesome, charitable views of men and things cannot be acquired by vegetating in one little corner of the earth all one's lifetime” Which means that travel allows people to stop being bigoted and xenophobic and instead focus their fears on things that are truly scary and a threat to us 

In our world, I believe that migrants to the US should learn English

I am symbolically okish (I guess )with The Keep Families Together Act https://www.king.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/king-colleagues-introduce-legislation-to-halt-separation-of-immigrant-families . Though making it a tad more conservative wouldn’t hurt

I support allowing the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to be notified when illegal immigrants attempt to purchase guns 

I am ok with the Zapatistas

I lay down my arms and accept more funding for the US ports of entry, fixing tech on our borders and updating our eco and environmental protections in areas like the Rio Grande.

People can move to Japan not become Japanese ,people can move to Britain but not become British but people can move to America and become American. That is a message some hardliners on migration need to get. Optimism trumps determinism

I support Australia like Jus soli

I support Malcolm Turnbull’s migrant exchange with the US (assuming the migrants were vetted enough)

I condone Australia’s hardline immigration laws under Scott Morrison in 2020 and 2021 since in 2020 and 2021 Australia needed to heavily restrict immigration

Migrants and refugees in Europe don’t commit more crime per say than legal citizens in Europe, but they need to be crime fighters crime in Europe to  erase the false myth that they do commit more crime. 

In Europe only, I believe the number of refugees to be accepted needs to be determined through negotiations. For the US, I am more liberal on refugees as seen in this blog

I want every migrant, refugee and illegal immigrant to be peaceful and possibly be peacekeepers in their communities.  I am glad Sweden deports and then permenantly bans terrorists from going back their country after they are out of prison 

However, I view a few of the relatively rare migrant criminals, refugee criminals and illegal immigrant criminals in Europe as Sympathetic Anti Villains with Blue and Orange Morality (like the ones in Sweden) . 

Maybe this is for Left Acceleration reasons (to make Europe become more pro migrant but in my type of way) or because I don't think those migrants and refugees know better.  

I do believe that the rare bad apple migrants, refugees and illegals in Europe should be pushed to join youth centers or to join YMCAs or similar community organizations to intergrate themselves and connect with people instead of doing criminal acts to people.  

Many of those criminal migrants and refugees in Europe should do rap battles, MMA, religious debating, becoming activists or politicians to inspire change, military service, and similar positive things instead of felony or terrorist acts.

I support a soft repeal of the Schengen Agreement if there are terror attacks in Europe with maybe a common sense bipartisan update to the Dublin regulation in said scenerio

I don’t think the governments of Europe should sea taxis to bring migrants to Europe since I am a Libertarian and less government involved in things the better. I am not against migrants coming to Europe I am just against the governments funding those sea taxis

I do not support the United Nations migrant treaty

I don't believe that churches should snitch on illegal immigrants because that would be against God

Remember Jesus quote in the bible about David stealing the bread? I feel that is needed to provide nuance to the illegal immigration debate.

I am not a supporter of sanctuary states as my migration ideas in this blog are much better than sanctuary state ideas

I am ok with Texas and Florida busing illegal immigrants to blue states. 

It is better than deporting them. (though these views on.this forum ,which I agree with too, balance those views I have a bit)

Since I also am ok with Joe Biden flying illegal immigrants into the US each day in the middle of the night (since Biden flying illegal immigrants into the US each day in the middle of the night seems like some cool Cold War era stealth or secret US government type of act that the US government would have done during the Cold War within the US like Area 51 type of stealth and secret), I am bound by being ok with that to also be ok this (otherwise I would be a hypocrite)

Even at worst, the red states busing illegal immigrants to northern states is still not human trafficking , but there could be other charges filed against red states for those busings. However some illegal immigrants do traffic in other people over the border, so that is literal human trafficking but Liberal 2.0s don’t seem so concerned with that but they should be

It does suck that those illegal immigrants are being toyed with and used as political pinatas  . The well being of those illegal immigrants should be the number one concern before anything else 

You can’t throw red state Republicans in prison for these illegal immigrant busings because the Republican party is the new mafia, and you can’t take down the mob (unless you are Rudy Guilani)!!

The blue states should bus prison inmates to the red states as payback for red states busing illegal immigrants to blue states

I am against all xenophobia, no matter which side it comes from 

Here is my hot take post on a border ‘wall’

I am against the US using emergency border funding

Illegal immigrants don’t commit more or less crime (or violent crime) than legal citizens according to nearly nearly every study by mainstream researchers and academics

Sanctuary cities have the exact same amount of crime (including violent crime and robbery) as non Sanctuary cities according to nearly nearly every study by mainstream researchers and academics. 

Cities with high amounts of migrants (legal and illegal) have the exact same amount of crime (including violent crime and robbery) as cities with low amounts of migrants (legal and illegal) according to nearly nearly every study by mainstream researchers and academics. 

We need to implement my migration ideas so we don’t need to give illegal immigrants free healthcare

I supported the Jeremy Corbyn Brexit for the UK and I am glad that the UK left the EU

The market-liberal case for me supporting Brexit fuses together my view that eliminating a level of government is usually good; my generalized skepticism of distant and central authority; and my specific beliefs about the planning, socialist, or overregulatory propensities of the EU, particularly relative to the UK. 

The EU is antidemocratic which is an issue. The EU does bring one good thing to its workers: it gives its workers freedom of movement. It is vital for a working class revolution not to be limited to the national borders. It’s important that we organize internationally. So ironically the EU trying to suppress the working class does deliver us the greatest tool for overthrowing it. We gain strength in numbers.

I am against NAFTA

I am a soft Euroskeptic 

I am against the TPP for the same reasons Bernie Sanders is against it