mainadditiononegtgg

I practically and generally support the Non-aggression principle in ways that Mark Twain would support it “What presents itself to us as bourgeois legality is nothing but the violence of the ruling class, a violence raised to an obligatory norm from the outset”  Rosa L ei incumbit probatio qui dicit ... The burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies I conditionally and generally support the legalization of at least many victimless crimes as can be seen throughout this blog I am against neighborhoods , rv parks and housing developments having security cameras.  That is 1984 like invasion of privacy and is unconstitutional.  I support Defend the Guard Act I am against cities and towns being locked down (like Boston in 2013, see  this ) because of terrorist attacks or to catch terrorists. Boston was wrong to lockdown the city in 2013 due to the marathon bombing, they made innocent people suffer . They took away the liberty and freedom of movement ...

  .

I don’t find the race concept to be useful. I tend to use African American and black interchangeably in this blog  From Rationalwiki “ Modern scientific consensus is strongly against the race concept, though this was not always the case. In contrast, biological evidence for racialism has always been relatively weak, and modern evidence conclusively shows that racialism is fundamentally flawed. Scientific consensus: Races aren't useful “”[B]oundaries in global variation are not abrupt and do not fit a strict view of the race concept; the number of races and the cutoffs used to define them are arbitrary. The race concept is at best a crude first-order approximation to the geographically structured phenotypic variation in the human species. —biological anthropologist John Relethford in 2009 Major institutions with expertise have come down against the biological usefulness of race: “”DNA studies do not indicate that separate classifiable subspecies (races) exist within modern humans. W...