mainadditiononegtgg

Some people, including some LGBTQ people say that someone is born LGBTQ (i.e Gay-Queer/Transgender) instead of being LGBTQ (i.e Gay-Queer/Transgender) by choice is equating LGBTQ (i.e Gay-Queer/Transgender) status with disability For some LGBTQ (i.e Gay-Queer/Transgender), people, it is a choice. I dislike the narrative that LGBTQ (i.e Gay-Queer/Transgender) are helpless victims of their gender and/or sexuality. Some of them chose, and so freaking what? Some people , including some LGBTQ people say that it can be DAMAGING to the LGBTQ+ movement to relegate their gender and sexuality to something that is against their will (with some leftists saying that there is no gay gene, and that the Kinsey scale was debunked before it even got big). https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20160627-i-am-gay-but-i-wasnt-born-this-way Some exerts from that article: “Although much research has examined the possible genetic, hormonal, developmental, social and cultural influences on sexual orientation, no f...

Omniliberalism believes in the core principles of liberalism, freedom and equality, whilst believing in elements of other ideologies in a pragmatic way

Wikipedia has at least a somewhat Liberal 2.0 bias. But I have seen enough Wikipedia articles on politics to know they that Wikipedia is not a Liberal 2.0 echo chamber . As per Wikipedia user Pudeo , Wikipedia is a lot less Liberal 2.0 bias than Big Tech, Reddit etc Wikipedia has so many political articles, that if you find a Liberal 2.0 bias in one article you can find a non Liberal 2.0 counter bias on that very same subject in a more obscure article on that subject that isn’t as heavily monitored Wikipedia barely had a (proto) Liberal 2.0 or Liberal 2.0 bias in the 2000s decade Wikipedia has many international versions so there will be less Liberal 2.0 bias in those Wikis Wikipedia has cabals of biased Liberal 2.0 users . Here are some bias Liberal 2.0 fanchilds: Aquillion, Carrite Drmies : Drmies is an Auburn football fanatic, professor, who uses Wikipedia like it is social media Galobtter: Power hungry hat collector and an aggressive user Goodday a Wikipedia cultist troll who sucks...

https://www.adl.org/racism From ADL “* In the above definition, the term “white supremacy” refers to the systematic marginalization or oppression of people of color based on a socially constructed racial hierarchy that privileges people who identify as white. It does not refer to extremist ideologies which believe that white people are genetically or culturally superior to non-whites and/or that white people should live in a whites-only society      How is that not white supremacism? How can we take the ADL’s reporting on white supremacy seriously when they fundamentally change the meaning of it like that? The ADL'S definition of racism is itself racist because it ‘privileges’ white people in its definition. Here is my favorite contradiction “acknowledging white-supremacy as a problem is white-supremacist" LOL you can’t make this s**t up if you tried “Though many believe that race is determined by biology, it is now widely accepted that this classification system was in ...